Why is Apollo City better than TurboAnt R9?
Has 947.50 Wh more battery capacity
Has 34.00 km more range
Has 6.00 km/h higher top speed
Has 5.00° better hill climb angle
Is 4.50 kg lighter
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo City vs TurboAnt R9
Feature | Apollo City | TurboAnt R9 |
|---|---|---|
1199 $ BEST | 550 $ | |
500 W | 500 W | |
1000 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
960 Wh BEST | 12.5 Wh | |
69 km BEST | 35 km | |
4.5 h | N/A h | |
51 km/h BEST | 45 km/h | |
25 deg BEST | 20 deg | |
120 kg | 125 kg BEST | |
6061 Aircraft grade aluminum | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
29.5 kg BEST | 25 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
10 cm | 10 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: drum, Rear: drum | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo City and TurboAnt R9 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
