Why is Apollo Go better than Kukirin G3?
Has 522.00 Wh more battery capacity
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Go vs Kukirin G3
Feature | Apollo Go | Kukirin G3 |
|---|---|---|
949 $ BEST | 649 $ | |
350 W | 1200 W BEST | |
750 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
540 Wh BEST | 18 Wh | |
48 km | 70 km BEST | |
4.5 h | N/A h | |
45 km/h | 50 km/h BEST | |
30 deg | N/A deg | |
120 kg | N/A kg | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
21 kg | 28 kg BEST | |
IP66 | N/A | |
9 cm | 10.5 cm BEST | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: regenerative, Rear: drum | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode | Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: No | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on Kukirin |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Go and Kukirin G3 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
