Why is Kukirin G3 Pro better than Apollo Go?
Has 850.00 W more nominal motor power
Has 1650.00 W more peak motor power
Has 52.00 km more range
Has faster charge time by 7.50 h
Has 25.00 km/h higher top speed
Has 5.00° better hill climb angle
Is 14.00 kg lighter
Has better IP rating
Has 2.00 cm bigger wheels
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Go vs Kukirin G3 Pro
Feature | Apollo Go | Kukirin G3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
949 $ | 1289 $ BEST | |
350 W | 1200 W BEST | |
750 W | 2400 W BEST | |
hub | hub | |
540 Wh BEST | 28 Wh | |
48 km | 100 km BEST | |
4.5 h | 12 h BEST | |
45 km/h | 70 km/h BEST | |
30 deg | 35 deg BEST | |
120 kg | 120 kg | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
21 kg | 35 kg BEST | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
9 cm | 11 cm BEST | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: regenerative, Rear: drum | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode | Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on Kukirin |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Go and Kukirin G3 Pro in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
