Why is Apollo Go better than TurboAnt M10 Lite?
Has 529.60 Wh more battery capacity
Has 23.00 km more range
Has 20.00 km/h higher top speed
Has 15.00° better hill climb angle
Can carry 20.00 kg more
Is 5.60 kg lighter
Has 0.50 cm bigger wheels
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Go vs TurboAnt M10 Lite
Feature | Apollo Go | TurboAnt M10 Lite |
|---|---|---|
949 $ BEST | 300 $ | |
350 W | 350 W | |
750 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
540 Wh BEST | 10.4 Wh | |
48 km BEST | 25 km | |
4.5 h | 5.5 h BEST | |
45 km/h BEST | 25 km/h | |
30 deg BEST | 15 deg | |
120 kg BEST | 100 kg | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
21 kg BEST | 15.4 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
9 cm BEST | 8.5 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: regenerative, Rear: drum | Front: disc, Rear: electronic | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: No | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | USB charging port | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Go and TurboAnt M10 Lite in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
