Why is TurboAnt M10 Pro better than Apollo Go?
Has faster charge time by 1.00 h
Can carry 5.00 kg more
Has better IP rating
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Go vs TurboAnt M10 Pro
Feature | Apollo Go | TurboAnt M10 Pro |
|---|---|---|
949 $ BEST | 370 $ | |
350 W | 350 W | |
750 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
540 Wh BEST | 10.4 Wh | |
48 km | 48 km | |
4.5 h | 5.5 h BEST | |
45 km/h BEST | 32 km/h | |
30 deg BEST | 15 deg | |
120 kg | 125 kg BEST | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
21 kg BEST | 15.4 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
9 cm BEST | 8.5 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: regenerative, Rear: drum | Front: disc, Rear: electronic | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: No | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | USB charging port | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Go and TurboAnt M10 Pro in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
