Why is TurboAnt R9 better than Apollo Go?
Has 150.00 W more nominal motor power
Can carry 5.00 kg more
Is 4.00 kg lighter
Has better IP rating
Has 1.00 cm bigger wheels
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Go vs TurboAnt R9
Feature | Apollo Go | TurboAnt R9 |
|---|---|---|
949 $ BEST | 550 $ | |
350 W | 500 W BEST | |
750 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
540 Wh BEST | 12.5 Wh | |
48 km BEST | 35 km | |
4.5 h | N/A h | |
45 km/h | 45 km/h | |
30 deg BEST | 20 deg | |
120 kg | 125 kg BEST | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
21 kg | 25 kg BEST | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
9 cm | 10 cm BEST | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: regenerative, Rear: drum | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Go and TurboAnt R9 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
