Why is Apollo Phantom Stellar better than TurboAnt M10 Lite?
Has 3000.00 W more nominal motor power
Has 1789.60 Wh more battery capacity
Has 65.00 km more range
Has faster charge time by 4.50 h
Has 60.00 km/h higher top speed
Has 15.00° better hill climb angle
Can carry 50.00 kg more
Is 34.10 kg lighter
Has 2.50 cm bigger wheels
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Phantom Stellar vs TurboAnt M10 Lite
Feature | Apollo Phantom Stellar | TurboAnt M10 Lite |
|---|---|---|
3649 $ BEST | 300 $ | |
3350 W BEST | 350 W | |
7000 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
1800 Wh BEST | 10.4 Wh | |
90 km BEST | 25 km | |
10 h BEST | 5.5 h | |
85 km/h BEST | 25 km/h | |
30 deg BEST | 15 deg | |
150 kg BEST | 100 kg | |
Aerospace-grade aluminum | aluminum alloy | |
No | Yes BEST | |
49.5 kg BEST | 15.4 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
11 cm BEST | 8.5 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: hydraulic disc, Rear: hydraulic disc | Front: disc, Rear: electronic | |
Type: DOT 2.0 / phone-as-display, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, NFC unlock | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes, deckLights: Yes, 360Lighting: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: No | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App, Apple Find My | USB charging port | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Phantom Stellar and TurboAnt M10 Lite in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
