Why is Kukirin G3 Pro better than Apollo Phantom?
Has 650.00 W more peak motor power
Has 30.00 km more range
Has faster charge time by 3.00 h
Has 10.00° better hill climb angle
Has better IP rating
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Phantom vs Kukirin G3 Pro
Feature | Apollo Phantom | Kukirin G3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
2299 $ BEST | 1289 $ | |
1750 W BEST | 1200 W | |
1750 W | 2400 W BEST | |
hub | hub | |
1404 Wh BEST | 28 Wh | |
70 km | 100 km BEST | |
9 h | 12 h BEST | |
70 km/h | 70 km/h | |
25 deg | 35 deg BEST | |
150 kg BEST | 120 kg | |
Aircraft-grade aluminum | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
46 kg BEST | 35 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
11 cm | 11 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: hydraulic disc, Rear: hydraulic disc | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: DOT 2.0 / phone-as-display, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, NFC lock | Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes, deckLights: Yes, 360Lighting: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on Kukirin |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Phantom and Kukirin G3 Pro in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
