Why is Kukirin G4 better than Apollo Phantom?
Has 250.00 W more nominal motor power
Has 650.00 W more peak motor power
Has 5.00 km more range
Has faster charge time by 1.50 h
Has 5.00° better hill climb angle
Has better IP rating
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Phantom vs Kukirin G4
Feature | Apollo Phantom | Kukirin G4 |
|---|---|---|
2299 $ BEST | 889 $ | |
1750 W | 2000 W BEST | |
1750 W | 2400 W BEST | |
hub | hub | |
1404 Wh BEST | 20 Wh | |
70 km | 75 km BEST | |
9 h | 10.5 h BEST | |
70 km/h | 70 km/h | |
25 deg | 30 deg BEST | |
150 kg BEST | 120 kg | |
Aircraft-grade aluminum | steel + aluminum hybrid | |
Yes | Yes | |
46 kg BEST | 41.5 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
11 cm | 11 cm | |
pneumatic BEST | tubeless | |
Front: hydraulic disc, Rear: hydraulic disc | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: DOT 2.0 / phone-as-display, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, NFC lock | Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes, deckLights: Yes, 360Lighting: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on Kukirin |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Phantom and Kukirin G4 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
