Why is Apollo Phantom better than TurboAnt M10 Lite?
Has 1400.00 W more nominal motor power
Has 1393.60 Wh more battery capacity
Has 45.00 km more range
Has faster charge time by 3.50 h
Has 45.00 km/h higher top speed
Has 10.00° better hill climb angle
Can carry 50.00 kg more
Is 30.60 kg lighter
Has 2.50 cm bigger wheels
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Phantom vs TurboAnt M10 Lite
Feature | Apollo Phantom | TurboAnt M10 Lite |
|---|---|---|
2299 $ BEST | 300 $ | |
1750 W BEST | 350 W | |
1750 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
1404 Wh BEST | 10.4 Wh | |
70 km BEST | 25 km | |
9 h BEST | 5.5 h | |
70 km/h BEST | 25 km/h | |
25 deg BEST | 15 deg | |
150 kg BEST | 100 kg | |
Aircraft-grade aluminum | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
46 kg BEST | 15.4 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
11 cm BEST | 8.5 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: hydraulic disc, Rear: hydraulic disc | Front: disc, Rear: electronic | |
Type: DOT 2.0 / phone-as-display, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, NFC lock | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes, deckLights: Yes, 360Lighting: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: No | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App | USB charging port | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Phantom and TurboAnt M10 Lite in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
