Why is Kukirin G4 better than Apollo Pro?
Has 800.00 W more nominal motor power
Has faster charge time by 4.50 h
Is foldable
Has better IP rating
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Pro vs Kukirin G4
Feature | Apollo Pro | Kukirin G4 |
|---|---|---|
2299 $ BEST | 889 $ | |
1200 W | 2000 W BEST | |
2400 W | 2400 W | |
hub | hub | |
1560 Wh BEST | 20 Wh | |
100 km BEST | 75 km | |
6 h | 10.5 h BEST | |
70 km/h | 70 km/h | |
30 deg | 30 deg | |
150 kg BEST | 120 kg | |
Unibody aluminum | steel + aluminum hybrid | |
No | Yes BEST | |
42 kg BEST | 41.5 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
12 cm BEST | 11 cm | |
pneumatic BEST | tubeless | |
Front: mechanical drum, Rear: mechanical drum | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: DOT (phone as display), Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, navigation | Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes, deckLights: Yes, 360Lighting: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App, GPS | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on Kukirin |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Pro and Kukirin G4 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
