Why is Apollo Pro better than TurboAnt R9?
Has 700.00 W more nominal motor power
Has 1547.50 Wh more battery capacity
Has 65.00 km more range
Has 25.00 km/h higher top speed
Has 10.00° better hill climb angle
Can carry 25.00 kg more
Is 17.00 kg lighter
Has 2.00 cm bigger wheels
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Apollo Pro vs TurboAnt R9
Feature | Apollo Pro | TurboAnt R9 |
|---|---|---|
2299 $ BEST | 550 $ | |
1200 W BEST | 500 W | |
2400 W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
1560 Wh BEST | 12.5 Wh | |
100 km BEST | 35 km | |
6 h | N/A h | |
70 km/h BEST | 45 km/h | |
30 deg BEST | 20 deg | |
150 kg BEST | 125 kg | |
Unibody aluminum | aluminum alloy | |
No | Yes BEST | |
42 kg BEST | 25 kg | |
IP66 | IP54 BEST | |
12 cm BEST | 10 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: mechanical drum, Rear: mechanical drum | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: DOT (phone as display), Features: speed, battery level, ride mode, navigation | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes, deckLights: Yes, 360Lighting: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, Apollo App, GPS | N/A | |
More Details | View on Apollo | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Apollo Pro and TurboAnt R9 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
