Why is TurboAnt M10 Pro better than NIU KQi 200P?
Has faster charge time by 0.50 h
Has 7.00 km/h higher top speed
Can carry 5.00 kg more
Is 1.40 kg lighter
Has better IP rating
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between NIU KQi 200P vs TurboAnt M10 Pro
Feature | NIU KQi 200P | TurboAnt M10 Pro |
|---|---|---|
429 $ BEST | 370 $ | |
350 W | 350 W | |
N/A W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
365 Wh BEST | 10.4 Wh | |
54 km BEST | 48 km | |
5 h | 5.5 h BEST | |
25 km/h | 32 km/h BEST | |
20 deg BEST | 15 deg | |
120 kg | 125 kg BEST | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
14 kg | 15.4 kg BEST | |
IPX4 | IP54 BEST | |
25.4 cm BEST | 8.5 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: drum, Rear: regenerative | Front: disc, Rear: electronic | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode indicator | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: No | |
Bluetooth, NIU App | USB charging port | |
More Details | View on NIU | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between NIU KQi 200P and TurboAnt M10 Pro in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
