Why is TurboAnt R9 better than NIU KQi 200P?
Has 150.00 W more nominal motor power
Has 20.00 km/h higher top speed
Can carry 5.00 kg more
Is 11.00 kg lighter
Has better IP rating
Has better front brakes
Has better rear brakes
Has better display type
Technical Specifications
Compare features between NIU KQi 200P vs TurboAnt R9
Feature | NIU KQi 200P | TurboAnt R9 |
|---|---|---|
429 $ | 550 $ BEST | |
350 W | 500 W BEST | |
N/A W | N/A W | |
hub | hub | |
365 Wh BEST | 12.5 Wh | |
54 km BEST | 35 km | |
5 h | N/A h | |
25 km/h | 45 km/h BEST | |
20 deg | 20 deg | |
120 kg | 125 kg BEST | |
Aluminum alloy | aluminum alloy | |
Yes | Yes | |
14 kg | 25 kg BEST | |
IPX4 | IP54 BEST | |
25.4 cm BEST | 10 cm | |
pneumatic | pneumatic | |
Front: drum, Rear: regenerative | Front: disc, Rear: disc | |
Type: LED, Features: speed, battery level, ride mode indicator | Type: LCD, Features: speed, battery level, trip distance | |
headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | headlight: Yes, brakeLight: Yes, turnSignals: Yes | |
Bluetooth, NIU App | N/A | |
More Details | View on NIU | View on TurboAnt |
Visual Comparison
See the differences between NIU KQi 200P and TurboAnt R9 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
